J. Rafael Sendra, David Sevilla and Carlos Villarino
$A_1,A_3\in$ SYNACS group (UAH), $A_2\in$ GADAC group (UEx)
Partially supported by the Spanish Ministerio de EconomÃa y Competitividad and by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) under project MTM2014-54141-P as well as Junta de Extremadura and FEDER funds (group FQM024).
Radical objects arise naturally in CAGD by performing some operations on rational objects.
Example: offsets
Our goal is to find ways to manipulate algebraic, non-rational (radical) varieties in rational ways.
In this talk we will present our current ideas on
turning radicals into rationals.
\[\mP(t) = (t,\sqrt{t})\]
Is this the parabola $x=y^2$?
Is $(1,-1)$ a solution of $x=y^2$? in $\Ima(\mP)$?
Behind is our interpretation of the symbol $\sqrt{t}$:
Is the denominator zero in $\left(\displaystyle\frac{1}{\sqrt[6]{t}\sqrt[3]{t}-\sqrt{t}},\,t\right)$ ?
In the parabola example, $\mP(t) = (t,\sqrt{t})$:
Both are reasonable paths.
And so we had to make up our minds...
A radical parametrization is a tuple $(x_1,\ldots,x_r)$
of elements of a radical field extension of $\C(t_1,\ldots,t_n)$.
More explicitly...
\[\C(\ot) = \F_0 \subset \F_1 \subset \cdots \subset \F_m\]
where $\F_i = \F_{i-1}(\delta_i)$ with $\delta_i^{e_i}=\alpha_i\in\F_{i-1}$
and $\F_m\ni$ $x_1,\ldots,x_r$$x_1$$(\ot)$$,\ldots,x_r$$(\ot)$
We call the $x_i$ functions because
we think of the $\ot$ as variables.
We also ask that their Jacobian has rank $n$.
$\mP(t) = (t,\sqrt{t})$ Not well defined!
\[(x(t),y(t)) = \left( t+\frac{1-\sqrt[4]{t^3+2t}}{\sqrt{t^2-\sqrt[3]{t-1}}} , \frac{\sqrt[4]{5\sqrt[3]{t-1}+1}}{t^3+5} \right)\]
\[(x(t),y(t)) = \left(t+\frac{1-\delta_4}{\delta_2},\frac{\delta_3}{t^3+5}\right)\]
Idea: turn those $\delta$'s into variables that
we will relate to the $t$'s.
Given a radical parametrization $\mP$, express it as
\[x_i(\ot)=\frac{x_{iN}(\ot,\delta_1,\ldots,\delta_m)}{x_{iD}(\ot,\delta_1,\ldots,\delta_m)} \,,\quad \delta_i^{e_i}=\alpha_i\]
\[\alpha_1=\frac{\alpha_{1N}(\ot)}{\alpha_{1D}(\ot)}, \ \ldots, \ \alpha_m=\frac{\alpha_{mN}(\ot,\delta_1,\ldots,\delta_{m-1})}{\alpha_{mD}(\ot,\delta_1,\ldots,\delta_{m-1})}\]
We define the incidence variety $\BP$ associated to this representation as the zeroset of the polynomials
in the ring $\C[\OT,\Delta_1,\ldots,\Delta_m,X_1,\ldots,X_r,Z]$
\[ \mP = \left(t,\sqrt{1-t^2}\right) \]
\[ \delta^2 = 1-t^2, \ x = t, \ y=\delta \]
\[ \BP = V(\Delta^2-1+T^2, X-T, Y-\Delta, Z-1) \]
We can eliminate everything except $X$ and $Y$:
\[ Y^2+X^2=1 \]
$\BP$ does not discriminate branches of the $\delta_i$; all possibilities are included.
$\BP$ can be reducible (example later). We define $\CP$ as the closure of the image of our branch:
\[ \varphi\colon (\ot) \mapsto (\ot, \bar{\delta}, \bar{x}, z) \]
$\CP = \overline{\Ima(\varphi)} \subset \BP$ and it is irreducible.
The image of a radical parametrization is, intuitively, the evaluation of the $t$'s, the $\delta$'s, and the coordinates as functions of them.
Algebraically, the radical variety defined by $\mP$ is
\[ \VP = \overline{\pi_\mP(\CP)} \]
where $\pi_\mP(\OT,\overline\Delta,\overline{X},Z)=(\overline{X})$
defined as
$\VP$ coincides with $\overline{\Ima(\mP)}$, so it does not depend on the representation of $\mP$.
$\mP=(\sqrt[4]{t^2},t)$ where $\sqrt[4]1=1$ (!)
Take the tower $\C(t)\subset \C(\sqrt[4]{t^2})$ (degree 2 extension)
$\BP=V(\Delta^4-T^2,X-\Delta,Y-T,Z-1)$
$V(X^4-Y^2) = V(X^2-Y) \cup V(X^2+Y)$
$\Ima(\mP)$ is half of $V(X^2-Y)=\VP$
The "conjugate parametrizations" $(i^k\sqrt[4]{t^2},t)$, $k=1,2,3$, cover the other three half-parabolas.
Maybe you think that we should not allow
roots that are not simplified...
$\sqrt[4]{t^2} \quad \rightsquigarrow \quad \Delta^4-T^2$
$\sqrt{t} \quad \rightsquigarrow \quad \Delta^2-T$
So do we, sometimes...
Can you simplify?
Looking at the fibres of $\pi_\mP$ is a reasonable alternative to looking at the fibres of $\mP$.
The tracing index of $\mP$ is the degree of the map $\pi_P$, that is, the generic cardinality of $\pi_\mP^{-1}(p)$ for $p\in\VP$.
There is a dense subset of $\Ima(\mP)$ whose fibres by $\pi_P$ have cardinality equal to the tracing index of $\mP$.
$\mP=(t^2,\sqrt{t^2+1})$. Then $\VP=V(Y^2-X-1)$ and $\CP=\BP=V(\Delta^2-T^2-1,X-T^2,Y-\Delta,Z-1)$
Every point $(a,b)\in\VP$ with $a\neq0$ has two preimages in $\CP$, namely $T=\pm\sqrt{a}$, so the tracing index of $\mP$ is two.
On the other hand, $(1,\sqrt2)\in\VP$ has two preimages by $\mP$, but $(1,-\sqrt2)\in\VP$ has no preimage. Indeed, only half of the points of $\VP$ are covered by $\mP$.
$\VT=\overline{\Ima(\psi)}$ also encodes relevant information
about the parametrization.
The radical map
\[\mP\colon\quad \C^n\rightarrow\VP\colon\quad\quad \OT\mapsto\overline{X}\]
is then "lifted" to the rational map
\[\mR\colon\quad \VT\rightarrow\VP\colon\quad (\OT,\overline{\Delta})\mapsto\overline{X}\]
$\VT$ has dimension $n$ and is contained in the zeroset of
$(\Delta_1)^{e_1}\cdot\alpha_{1D}(\OT) - \alpha_{1N}(\OT)$,
$(\Delta_i)^{e_i}\cdot\alpha_{iD}(\OT,\Delta_1,\ldots)-\alpha_{iN}(\OT,\Delta_1,\ldots)$
\[ \mathrm{genus}(\VT)\geq\mathrm{genus}(\VP) \]
\[\ \Downarrow \]
\[ \VT \mbox{ rational curve} \ \Rightarrow\ \VP \mbox{ rational curve} \]
Additionally, if the tracing index of $\mP$ is one,
\[ \VT \mbox{ rational curve} \ \Leftrightarrow\ \VP \mbox{ rational curve} \]
Just by knowing which roots appear in a parametrization ($\VT$) you may be able to say things about the parametrization ($\VP$).
For example, any curve parametrized by rational functions in $t$ and $\sqrt[n]{t}$ is automatically rational, because $V(\Delta^n-T)$ is rational.
Probably there are similar results
related to the plurigenera.
If the tracing index of $\mP$ is one,
\[ \VT \mbox{ rational} \ \Leftrightarrow\ \VP \mbox{ rational} \]
If $\VT$ is unirational, then $\VP$ is unirational. Furthermore, if $\mT(\ot)$ is a rational parametrization of $\VT$ then $\mP(\pi_\mathbb{T}\circ\mT(\ot))$ is a rational parametrization of $\VP$ where $\pi_\mathbb{T}(\OT,\overline{\Delta}) = (\OT)$.
Let $\mP=\left(\sqrt[3]{t},\sqrt{1-\sqrt[3]{t^2}}\right)$.
$\VT=V(\Delta_1^3-T,\Delta_2^2-1+\Delta_1^2)$ is rational.parametrized as
\[ \mT(t)=\left( \left(\frac{2t}{1+t^2}\right)^3,\frac{2t}{1+t^2},\frac{1-t^2}{1+t^2} \right) \]
We obtain the rational reparametrization
\[ \mP\left(\left(\frac{2t}{1+t^2}\right)^3\right) = \left( \frac{2t}{1+t^2},\frac{1-t^2}{1+t^2} \right). \]
Assume that an algorithm that decides the existence
of rational parametrizations is known.
$\displaystyle\int R(\sqrt[3]{t},\sqrt{1-\sqrt[3]{t^2}})\,dt$, where $R$ is a rational function, can always be converted by $u=\left(\displaystyle\frac{2t}{1+t^2}\right)^3$ into the integral of a rational function in $u$.
For example, $\displaystyle\int \frac{1}{\sqrt[3]{t}+\sqrt{1-\sqrt[3]{t^2}}}\,dt$ becomes the integral of a rational function in $u$ of degree 8.
Under which conditions are $\BP$ and $\VT$ irreducible?
Under which conditions $\VT$ rational $\Leftrightarrow$ $\VP$ rational?