|
VINCENT TAOHSUN CHANG
National. Chengchi University (TAIWAN)
Visual meaning in multimodal discourse:
an experimental pragmatic approach
Pragmática / Pragmatics
How does our knowledge of language and of context
endow us to understand what we are told, to resolve
ambiguities, to grasp both explicit and implicit contents,
and to appreciate non-literal expressions—metaphor,
irony, pun, hyperbole, humour, poetic effects, and,
non-verbal communication? These issues have often been
approached within linguistic pragmatics and psycholinguistics,
whilst with only limited interactions between the two.
This paper thus aims to explore the audience's perception,
comprehension and interpretation of visual image in
multimodal communication , reexamining the explanatory
adequacy of Relevance framework (Sperber & Wilson
1986/1995) and exploring the significant novelty of
experimental pragmatics (Noveck & Sperber 2005).
Research questions:
This paper attempts to investigate implicit meaning
conveyed in multimodal discourse, trying to explain
and render plausible interpretations to the following
research questions:
1. What explicit and implicit information and cognitive
contextual effects would be perceived and inferred by
the (different) receptors through the integration of
the visual images and slogans employed within institutionalised
discourse / specialised communication?
2. The implicit meaning, especially weak implicatures
involving feelings, attitudes, emotions and impressions,
will fall into an indeterminate range. Can we regard
these as scalar implicatures with different functional
loadings or weights?
3. Which inferred salient implicature of implicit meanings
could possibly be served as default value?
4. Will the results of this study enhance the explanatory
power of Neo-Gricean pragmatic theories in terms of
language, cognition and communication, e.g. Relevance
Theory (Sperber & Wilson 1986/1995; Noveck &
Sperber 2005)?
Methodology
The current study is to conduct an experiment by randomly
sampling one dozen students from different departments
at NCCU to look into six captions designed for the Olympics
2008 released by Mainland China. The subjects are to
watch (and hence process) the six captions (for around
one to two minutes) first, as shown below; and then
report/narrate the pictures they just perceived and
processed respectively as much as they possibly can
(for three to five minutes or so). These activated meanings
are then tape-recorded for further analysis.
Expected results:
What the subjects have (actively, creatively and imaginatively)
inferred are supposed to fall into a wide range of weak
implicatures along with strong implicatures, depending
on the different degrees of involvement and shared background
knowledge in terms of cultural, social, political aspects
etc. At the least case, the subjects could process and
tell what is all about the slogan "???, ????! (Olympic
Fever Heats the Whole Beijing!)" — the explicit
meaning. Or if unfortunately not, then the communication
is unsuccessful, which somehow still conforming the
principle of relevance. After all, by the same token,
we couldn't expect that all the students in one class
would understand one joke simultaneously, or would process
therein at the same speed. Considering "…there
is no clear cut-off point between assumptions strongly
backed by the communicator, and the assumptions derived
from the utterance on the addressee's sole responsibility,"
(cf. fn. 2) we group/classify the implicatures according
to the order that they previously narrated. We compare
then those implicatures inferred and derived by those
subjects to see the overlapping (or quasi-overlapping/similar)
parts to re-/organise and find the functional loadings
— scalar implicatures (cf. Noveck & Sperber
2005). Also expectedly to assign the salient meaning(s)
of them as default value accordingly.
Keywords: experimental pragmatics, implicature, multimodal
discourse, relevance, visual meaning
References
Forceville, Charles J. (2005). Multimodal metaphors
in commercials. Paper for "The pragmatics of multimodal
representations" panel at the 9th International
Pragmatics Association (IPrA) Conference, July 10-15,
Riva del Garda, Italy.
Noveck, Ira A. and Dan Sperber (Eds.). (2005). Experimental
Pragmatics. (Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Languages
and Cognition). Palgrave Macmillan.
Pilkington, Adrian. (1992). Poetic Effects. Lingua 87:
29-51.
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. (1986/1995). Relevance:
Communication and Cognition. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
Tanaka, Keiko. (1994). Advertising Language: A Pragmatic
Approach to Advertisements in Britain and Japan. London:
Routledge.
Asociación de Jóvenes
Lingüistas
ajl2006@gmail.com
Última
modificación: 04-04-2006 12:00 |